Contents
-
Imperfect Congruence
- A mathematical note
- About the author
- Part 1: Kepler and the regular polygon tilings
- Part 2: Rhomb/rhombus/rhombic tilings
-
Part 3: A universal tiler
- Fans and other rhombic structures
- Regular polygon decomposition
- Regular polygon decomposition (odd)
- Worms and zonagons
- Decomposition algorithm
- Decomposition mathematics
- Variations on the universal tiler
- The regular polygon extension theorem
- The triangle extension theorem
- The rule of two
- The vertex figure extension conjecture
- Vertex figure extension examples
- More vertex figure extension examples
- Part 4: Five-fold symmetry
- Conclusion
- Tiling Gallery
- Appendix: Bridges conference
- Appendix: Proof of the Gap Theorem
- Appendix: Tiling source code
A thin 5.5.10 tiling
We can arrange this patch in the same pattern as Dürer’s thin tiling if we allow some overlap as we can see in the image below. Vertically it is possible to overlap two of the 5-fold patches so that the polygons match exactly. Horizontally, however, there is an inconsistency. Different tile shapes overlap. In order to extend this to a tiling, we will need to delete some of the polygons in the rhomb-shaped gap and fill this gap with a consistent pattern.
It turns out that this can be done as can be seen in the tiling below. There is something slightly strange to my eye about the pattern of tiles in the rhomb-shaped gap. I think of this as a “broken rose” tiling. Despite a number of attempts, I have not succeeded in filling the gap without breaking the roses.
Those with sharp eyes will notice that the gap also features two patches of rhombs that form fused decagons - perhaps relatives of the ones that appear in Kepler’s Aa tiling?
Translational unit
Legend
Skeleton tiling
Tiling (black and white)
Translational unit (black and white)
